tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7141615629701321642.post1143920385674722422..comments2024-01-07T08:41:13.864-05:00Comments on C A I T I - O N L I N E: Flaherty’s INCOME trust tax is like 2.5 million looming job lossesBrent Fullardhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08515599756822506137noreply@blogger.comBlogger10125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7141615629701321642.post-53103701512966697532010-02-02T15:50:57.277-05:002010-02-02T15:50:57.277-05:00Daniel old buddy.
Mr Harper recommended income tr...Daniel old buddy.<br /><br />Mr Harper recommended income trusts to us during his election campaign in 2006--many people voted for him on that basis---I voted for him not because I owned trusts because I didn`t , but because I thought he was the best man for job.<br /><br />I subsequently went out & bought income trusts because he recommended them--since he was a trained economist , I figured he must know what he is talking about---because he was our PM ,I thought he would not steer us wrong.<br /><br />After the betrayal & the massacre that ensued , the Harper gov`t did nothing to help us at all.<br /><br />Brent Fullard , having the foresight , went looking for an answer & found it---the gov`t was lying.<br /><br />He subsequently formed CAITI to gather together likeminded souls in an attempt to right a terrible wrong.<br /><br />We , the small investor , were looking for someone to help & that sure was not the gov`t or any politician from any party.<br /><br />We turned to Brent because he knew what he was talking about & was not afraid to step on some toes.<br /><br />Kowtowing to politicians & the media is not his style nor is it ours--all a bunch of kiss-ass will get you is brown lips & a "get lost son".<br /><br />I have learned one thing in my many years is that if you do not fight for what is right , you might as well be dead.<br /><br />So buzz-off little Daniel as you add nothing to the discussion.<br /><br />Dr Mike Popovich--Rodney OntDr Mikehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16915911929286615081noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7141615629701321642.post-12439409326332542262010-02-02T15:33:20.707-05:002010-02-02T15:33:20.707-05:00Lobbyists are not always paid. Anyone who speaks ...Lobbyists are not always paid. Anyone who speaks to public officials regarding policy is a lobbyist. Many your letters to public officials have even been reprinted on your site to prove that you are indeed one. Many lobbyists represent charities or ratepayer groups. <br /><br />You are also an income trust investor, so you would see net benefit of said policy, so you are to be paid indirectly.<br /><br />Your name should be Brent "failed lobbyist" Fullard.Daniel Millernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7141615629701321642.post-40886057183859745202010-02-02T14:53:46.128-05:002010-02-02T14:53:46.128-05:00DM:
Not a "lobbyist". Lobbyists are pai...DM:<br /><br />Not a "lobbyist". Lobbyists are paid. I am not paid for the advocacy work that I do, which makes me different than virtually everybody else, Don Martin included.<br /><br />Have a nice day. Please take your lame advice elsewhere....maybe to some paid lobbyist.<br /><br />You have exhausted your usefulness.<br /><br />BrentBrent Fullardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08993836985053687442noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7141615629701321642.post-10655120153346225942010-02-02T14:28:22.807-05:002010-02-02T14:28:22.807-05:00That's the thing Brent, you see nothing wrong ...That's the thing Brent, you see nothing wrong with that reply you just gave me. I will not give you a lesson here, but anyone who understands politics knows what I am talking about. You should try some media training, perhaps. <br /><br />But it is an example why you are the worst lobbyist in the history of Canada. Your members are not served well.Daniel Millernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7141615629701321642.post-91748427376054132922010-02-02T13:38:35.501-05:002010-02-02T13:38:35.501-05:00Daniel:
You have to stop living in the past and s...Daniel:<br /><br />You have to stop living in the past and start living in the present, boy.<br /><br />I can't help the fact that Don Martin went juvenile in the press about somebody (me) who was unwilling to take no for an answer when I politely asked Don Martin to release to me the copy of Harper's 200 page manual on how to disrupt parliament and parliamentary committees.<br /><br />As you may know Don Martin was given this manual by some Liberal who found it left behind by some CON Committtee Chairman.<br /><br />Do you suppose that Liberal gave it to Don for "safe keeping" or to have its contents faithfully reported on in the press?<br /><br />This document took on heightened signficance at the time of Harper's reneging on his fixed election promise that gave rise to the 2008 election, in which he jsutified this arbitrary and unlawful action by sayinng that Parliament was 'dysfunctional". How could that be as it wasn;t even sitting and furthermore it was Harper as evidenced by his Manual that made it dysfunctional.<br /><br />So upon asking Don for the only known copy of this Manual at the time of the 2008 election being called what did he say, being the professional journalist that he ostensibly is? <br /><br />"Do your own research", as if to suggest that somebody handing him a 200 pages manual on how to obstruct Parliament can be considered "reasech" in its own right!<br /><br />More like hiding the real truth from the public.<br /><br />Say Hi to Don for me, and send him my condolences that compromising himself in this, and other ways, didn't land him one of those 5 coveted seats in the recent Senate Draft.<br /><br />Brent Fullard<br /><br />PS Your comment of "Come on CATI members -- wake up and smell the coffee. " would suggest that it is YOU who is not being listened to here, rather than me, as you alleged in the immediate prior post.<br /><br />You do bounce from hot to cold in the blink of an eye!Brent Fullardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08993836985053687442noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7141615629701321642.post-16175186939163982182010-02-02T12:58:14.197-05:002010-02-02T12:58:14.197-05:00No one listens to you because of your tactics. If...No one listens to you because of your tactics. If I am a member of the media or elected politician, I do not support the Marshall Plan just because you are involved with it. <br /><br />Don Martin had a great column about you during the election. You should re-read that and reflect about what he was telling you.<br /><br />Come on CATI members -- wake up and smell the coffee. Brent Fullard is killing your message.Daniel Millernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7141615629701321642.post-61346179439971459842010-02-02T12:24:43.366-05:002010-02-02T12:24:43.366-05:00Daniel Miller:
I think you have finally hit the n...Daniel Miller:<br /><br />I think you have finally hit the nail on the head (for once?)!<br /><br />Do you really think that "no one listens to Brent Fullard."?<br /><br />That probably explains the mess this country is in< since EVERY ONE of my predictions over the past three years has proven to be PRESCIENT and TRUE.<br /><br />Good of you to point out this obvious flaw concerning not enough people listening to me.<br /><br />Please let us know what your suggestions are so that you and we can remedy that obvious omission.<br /><br />Brent Fullard<br /><br />PS Thanks!Brent Fullardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08993836985053687442noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7141615629701321642.post-70160719311925590222010-02-02T11:34:50.054-05:002010-02-02T11:34:50.054-05:00Good Lord!!! Why on earth isn't the Liberal Pa...Good Lord!!! Why on earth isn't the Liberal Party advertising more about their income trust proposal?? I'd way rather vote for a party that solves the problem with a specialized 10% tax for foreigners, than the Conservatives who have hiked my fake income so high, I have to pay much more Ontario health tax, with their stupid dividend tax credit scheme. And I'd MUCH rather change the government, than try to continue to scramble to try to replace the income I'm going to lose.<br /><br />Or is it just a rumour that the Liberals were trialing, about changing the income trust rules??Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7141615629701321642.post-90213979424855368382010-02-02T11:06:07.076-05:002010-02-02T11:06:07.076-05:00Daniel my man.
Good to hear from you again.
The ...Daniel my man.<br /><br />Good to hear from you again.<br /><br />The unfortunate thing is that you have nothing concrete to offer other than bashing Brent Fullard.<br /><br />And you do this why??<br /><br />You are obviously a guy with a personal axe to grind or just some malcontent sent by one of the political parties to stir the pot.<br /><br />Perhaps , instead of bashing Mr Fullard , you could deal directly with the issues here.<br /><br />Give us your opinion on the Marshall Plan why don`t you--tell us what is good about it .<br /><br />Tell us what is bad about it.<br /><br />Give us some concrete input rather than a bucket full of drool.<br /><br />It`s time to debate rather than your incessant line of deconstructive criticism.<br /><br />Dr Mike Popovich---Rodney OntDr Mikehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16915911929286615081noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7141615629701321642.post-82933595679794202192010-02-02T10:33:22.388-05:002010-02-02T10:33:22.388-05:00While you brag about the number of hits (who don&#...While you brag about the number of hits (who don't show anything about support) of you Marshall Plan website, I don't see you bragging about the number of views that you have on the right hand side of your latest missive against Jack Layton. Part 4 says that you have had only 164 views. That includes about 4 of my views and who knows how many other multiple views. <br /><br />It is just further proof that no one listens to Brent Fullard.Daniel Millernoreply@blogger.com