tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7141615629701321642.post8955421987277930437..comments2024-01-07T08:41:13.864-05:00Comments on C A I T I - O N L I N E: Canada’s AG as negligent as SEC in uncovering major acts of fraudBrent Fullardhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08515599756822506137noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7141615629701321642.post-52460120085639290562009-05-21T08:53:10.429-04:002009-05-21T08:53:10.429-04:00Total b.s. excuse. Keep trying.
Makes you wond...Total b.s. excuse. Keep trying. <br /><br />Makes you wonder what the real reason is why she won't investigate? Could it be perhaps she is personally benefiting somehow by not investigating this matter? <br /><br />These "guilty, stupid sounding, contradictory" responses from her office are a clear indicator something is going on, there is something to hide and she knows it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7141615629701321642.post-2898823968590047232009-05-21T08:32:30.317-04:002009-05-21T08:32:30.317-04:00Why is this happening now? The spark was the Bimb...Why is this happening now? The spark was the Bimbo MPs in the UK Parliament. But why did the Canadian AG knee-jerk to a Bimbo Brit story?<br /> <br />"Knee-jerk" is a correct word but there may be a better word for getting pronged in the backside. The AG has been told to start this story-thread by the PMO, and as a dutiful employee of the Minority of Steve she must start this story-thread.<br /> <br />My point is that the PMO wants s$$t and dust all around flying to distract the media to distract the nitwit Canadians. <br /><br />Two weeks ago it was the Dhalla playhouse story, in a week or two, it'll be something else. <br /><br />LMAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7141615629701321642.post-2168494350114882232009-05-21T08:04:55.707-04:002009-05-21T08:04:55.707-04:00Please get on with it Sheila!
I would appreciate ...Please get on with it Sheila!<br /><br />I would appreciate a response!<br /> <br />Doug Boraas<br />Canadian TaxpayerAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7141615629701321642.post-75494421188805289392009-05-21T07:55:13.368-04:002009-05-21T07:55:13.368-04:00Brent,
Your argument is what I would consider th...Brent,<br /> <br />Your argument is what I would consider the very essence of the accountability of the Auditor General. <br /><br />It is so obvious to me. Why not, to her?<br /><br />RandyAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7141615629701321642.post-25968024990938002802009-05-21T07:53:41.625-04:002009-05-21T07:53:41.625-04:00"not to question government policy".
So what give..."not to question government policy".<br /><br />So what gives with this comment??<br /><br />She comments on government policy all of the time investigating the waste caused by the Canadian Firearms Program or how multinational companies that operate in Canada enjoying hundreds of millions of dollars in tax loopholes or how Public Works Canada spending $1.7 billion annually on office space.<br /><br />So her messaging is bunk--investigating tax leakage comes under her all-inclusive purview to look for waste. <br /><br />Loss of tax dollars be it from the gun registry or the Tax Fairness Plan , it is all the same--waste is waste.<br /><br />It appears the long arm of the PM has probably visited the office of the at-arms-length Auditor General.<br /><br />Dr Mike popovichDr Mikehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16915911929286615081noreply@blogger.com