Jack Mintz is the Benedict Arnold of retirement savings

Too late
 
Calgary Herald
January 3, 2010
 
Re: "Don't panic on pensions," Editorial, Dec. 27.

I fully concur with your position on this issue. You and other media have, however, missed one of the key points in Jack Mintz's paper: "Retirement income adequacy depends not only on saving, but also on the investment performance of retirement funds." It is obvious that the amount of savings necessary to generate adequate levels of retirement income is reduced if there is an after-tax return of three to five per cent or more, rather than one or two per cent.

It is ironic that Mintz is the author of the current paper on retirement income adequacy, considering his earlier role in creating the false belief that income trusts caused tax leakage through the RRSP structure.

That belief was presented by the government as a key justification in getting rid of income trusts, a tool that millions of Canadians used to improve retirement income returns with no change in investment risk. In addition, many will recall that the tax change announcement in 2006 also caused a sudden drop in the net worth of retirement accounts that rivals the effect of the current recession.

If there is merit in improving the adequacy of retirement income, it is important to remember the investment return on retirement funds as well as the saving side of the equation. For the many Canadians nearing retirement or already retired, it is too late for the latter.

Clinton T. Broughton, Calgary

© Copyright (c) The Calgary Herald

Jack Layton thanks you for writing

Mr Layton:

When are you going to expose Harper's lies about tax leakage, that was his false justification for the income trust tax?

He only provided 18 pages of blacked out documents as his so called "proof" of tax leakage, just like he's trying to get away with on the Afghan detainee matter.

Are Afghan detainees more important to the NDP than Canadian seniors who lost $35 billion of their retirement savings for what may be NO GOOD REASON?

Why the double standard? Do you not want to be like Barack Obama who said he wants to be known as the Empirical President, a president whose decisions are based on facts and not just hollow dogma, like tax leakage with zero proof?

Please get us the facts upon which the NDP party supported Harper's income trust tax. Your party will be rewarded for asking. Punished in the polls for not.

It's your choice. Honesty in gov't or blacked out documents?

I await your response. OUR democracy turns on it.

Brent Fullard
President and CEO
Canadian Association of Income Trust Investors
www.caiti.info

647 505-2224 (cell)


On 12/18/09 12:15 PM, "LaytoJ@parl.gc.ca" wrote:

> We would like to acknowledge receipt and thank you for your correspondence.
> Please be assured your comments and views are valued as all emails receive
> proper attention. If required, we will be providing a specific reply to your
> concern.
>
> If you would like information concerning the work of our team of New Democrat
> MPs and our latest policies, please visit our website at: http://www.ndp.ca.
>
> Again, thank you for writing.
>
> All the best,
>
>
> Office of Jack Layton, MP (Toronto-Danforth)
> Leader, Canada's New Democrats