Like we've asked before:
Monday, December 22, 2014
Amanda Lang: Explained
Like we've asked before:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
See: Lang Did Paid Manulife Speaking Gigs and Then Gave Them Favourable Coverage
Like we've asked before:
Will Amanda Lang continue to espouse Flaherty's tax leakage lies on CBC?
CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF INCOME TRUST INVESTORS WEBLOG
Like we've asked before:
LINKS
Todays top 10
Subscribe by feed or email
VIDEOS
Part 1: Why did Jack Layton fall for Harper's tax leakage lie?
Part 2: Why did Jack Layton fall for Harper's tax leakage lie?
Part 3: Why did Jack Layton fall for Harper's tax leakage lie?
Part 4: Why did Jack Layton fall for Harper's tax leakage lie?
Sheriff Flaherty: "It's the law now."
Vancouver Quadra campaign: Cadman and income trust scandals
Finance Committee questions Mark Carney
Part 2: Why did Jack Layton fall for Harper's tax leakage lie?
Part 3: Why did Jack Layton fall for Harper's tax leakage lie?
Part 4: Why did Jack Layton fall for Harper's tax leakage lie?
Sheriff Flaherty: "It's the law now."
Vancouver Quadra campaign: Cadman and income trust scandals
Finance Committee questions Mark Carney
EVENTS
Income Trust Halloween Vigil
Thanks to all who participated in both the Ottawa and Calgary vigils to mark the anniversary of the announcement.
Thanks to all who participated in both the Ottawa and Calgary vigils to mark the anniversary of the announcement.
WE"D LIKE SOME ANSWERS
As you well know, the ‘income trust thing’ has grown beyond the question of whether fair taxes are paid on income from trusts. It’s become a giant dirty snowball, and as it rolls forward it accumulates more and more bulk. There are so many unanswered questions. Let's list a few and invite our "Accountable" government and our free press to provide some much-needed answers.
It is said “Trusts are inefficient use of capital. Why?” Two related questions are ‘Whose money is it, anyway?’, and ‘Do Canadian investors have a free and efficient market?’
How can information that is already in the public domain at SEDAR make for a state secret? How could such information be used to harm the Canadian national interest? And who would cause the harm?
Why won’t the Canadian media investigate the falsehoods and misrepresentations told by the Minister of Finance to a committee of Parliament? Was the Minister in contempt of Parliament?
Why won’t the Canadian media report (a) government tax revenues gained from BCE in 2006 when BCE was a corporation to (b) government tax revenues that would be gained in 2007 from BCE, if BCE had been allowed to proceed to a trust, and (c) government tax revenues that will be gained in 2007 from BCE, when BCE ownership has been carved up as 45% foreign ownership and 55% large Canadian pension fund ownership?
No comments:
Post a Comment