So Pat Martin thinks he can make slanderous comments, and when faced with facts to the contrary not issue an apology or a retraction., and get away with it? And when sued for slander, Pat Martin thinks his defense is worthy of Canadians' support?
Only a self-righteous motor mouth like Pat Martin would think his is a cause worthy of Canadians' financial support.
Where was Pat Martin when it came to supporting the 2.5 million Canadians who lost $35 billion of their hard earned retirement savings when Stephen Harper (with the support of Jack Layton's NDP) began double taxing income trusts at rate in excess of 60%? Did Pat Martin seek the facts of the situation? No. Did Pat Martin defend the rights of these Canadians? No. Did Pat Martin do anything to mitigate their losses?
No, but in true Pat "Motor Mouth" Martin fashion, found the occasion to be deserving of degrading both Parliament degrade income trusts, by stating in the House of Commons that income trusts were a "corporate wet-dream". This is the quality of the man we are dealing with here......"corporate wet-dream", as the means to express himself in Parliament.
It was only a matter of time that Motor Mouth Pat Martin got sued. Looks good on him. Anyone who contributes to this cause of Pat Martin's is as dellusional as the man himself.
NDP MP seeks public’s help with legal bills in robo-calls case
Supporters and friends of Pat Martin are trying to raise $250,000 after the Winnipeg MP was sued for comments he made about the 2011 election robo-calls scandal.