Wednesday, December 23, 2009

Tom Flanagan on deep spending cuts: "Suck it, nerds!"

From: Tom Flanagan
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 11:30:19 -0700

Subject: Re: It is the opposition to blame that we are now living in Tom Flanagan's neo-conservative dream. Flaherty's deficit plan: Take an axe and cut deep 'I've done it before,' in Harris-era Ontario

tom flanagan wrote:

To quote the lovely and talented Tina Fey, "Suck it, nerds!"

michael popovich wrote:

I hear that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is looking for a good used reactor -- the last bid for Chalk River was $1.37

On Dec 23, 2009, at 12:26 PM, Geoffrey Laxton wrote:

*/ It is the opposition to blame that we are now living in Tom Flanagan's neo-conservative dream. /*
“I'm hopeful there will be some ideologically-driven, neo-conservative cuts to government,'' political scientist Tom Flanagan, a former chief of staff to Harper, said in an interview. “I think that's always been sort of the long-term plan, the way that Stephen was going about it of first depriving the government of surpluses through cutting taxes . . . You get rid of the surpluses and then it makes it easier to make some expenditure reductions.'' /*

Flaherty's deficit plan: Take an axe and cut deep
'I've done it before,' in Harris-era Ontario

Les Whittington Ottawa Bureau
Toronto Star
December, 23 2009

OTTAWA–Faced with the largest federal deficit in history, Finance Minister Jim Flaherty says he will start looking for programs to axe and government assets to sell off as soon as the economy recovers.

"It's necessary for restraint to happen" to rein in Ottawa's spending, Flaherty told the Toronto Star in a year-end interview.

"We get hundreds and hundreds of programs that just trundle along, growing at 3 or 4 per cent a year or more – ahead of the rate of inflation – and it takes some resolve to restrain that spending growth."

With a chuckle, he admitted that slashing government programs can prompt public outrage. "Every program has a group of people who believe strongly in that program," he said.

But "some programs should end," Flaherty insisted. "This assumption in government – that every time a program is created, the program should go on indefinitely – is mistaken. So some programs should just end because their usefulness has ended."

Flaherty, who carried the provincial finance portfolio with the Mike Harris government in 2001-2002, said clamping down on spending "doesn't make one popular as a finance minister.

"I've done it before. I did it in Ontario."

Flaherty was a key figure all through the Harris years, when under the banner of the Common Sense Revolution Ontario's Progressive Conservatives elevated chopping government programs and reducing taxes to articles of faith.

In his 2001 Ontario budget, Flaherty handed $2.4 billion in tax cuts to the province's corporations, promised personal tax breaks and paid down $3 billion in provincial debt – all while balancing the books by holding down badly needed expenditures for universities, hospitals and infrastructure projects.

Praising the tax reductions of the Harris era, Flaherty told MPPs at the time: "Ontario paved the way for tax cuts in this country. I am proud that every province in Canada is following our lead."

Five years later, Prime Minister Stephen Harper's Conservatives came to power in Ottawa preaching tax cuts and smaller government in the same vein as Harris's Ontario Tories.

In one of his earliest acts as federal finance minister, Flaherty on Sept. 25, 2006, trimmed $1 billion from programs for human rights, women's issues, museums, youth employment and other initiatives. At the same time, he announced that a $13.2 billion budget surplus would be used to pay down the country's $481 billion debt.

Today, hamstrung by $33.9 billion a year in federal tax cuts and a $28 billion economic stimulus program, Flaherty is contending with the most bloated budget deficits ever recorded in Ottawa. The cumulative total of budget shortfalls will hit $164 billion by 2014.

The finance minister says he will continue with stimulative spending in 2010 to ensure the fragile economy makes a full recovery. But after that, the government will usher in a period of frugality intended to balance Ottawa's books again.

Because higher taxes have been ruled out, Flaherty will have to find the savings by getting tough on government spending. Some antiquated programs could be axed, he said, "but the more important thing is to just watch the rate of growth" of spending.

Most economists say this will be a daunting task. About half of the $241 billion in Ottawa's annual program expenses are for major social programs and cash transfers to the provinces – all of which grow automatically each year.

So in September, when the finance department laid out a rough program for bringing the deficit near zero by 2014, officials said doing so would require keeping the annual growth in the other $120 billion in annual federal program spending to 3.3 per cent.

While that might sound easy, analysts point out that doing so would mean significant reductions in the programs and services many Canadians count on.

The Harper Conservatives have so far shown little stomach for unpopular belt-tightening measures. Despite talking about government restraint, the government has allowed its spending since 2006 to climb by a hefty 7 per cent a year.

Flaherty also said he hopes to realize savings in operational costs by letting the federal public service shrink as employees retire over several years.

"We will have some natural attrition, too, in the federal public service over the next while because of demographics and we can look at that, too, as: Do we need to replace each person who retires?" he said.

Over the next four or five years, the government also hopes to drum up large chunks of cash by selling off billions of dollars in federal lands, buildings and Crown corporations, including possibly the Royal Canadian Mint, Via Rail and Atomic Energy Canada Ltd.

Governments have generally been lax when it comes to examining the need to own assets, Flaherty said.


Dr Mike said...

Merry Christmas to you too Tom.

Got to love a guy with a sense of humor.

Dr Mike Popovich

PS---just wish Flaherty would have showed such compassion & thoughtfulness when he fabricated his trust tax plan.

Actually he did.

Tax online said...

Really a Great and informative blog post... Great job by you.. Thanks for sharing,..

Anonymous said...

And 'seconding' Dr Mike and Tax online.

Perhaps, the CONservatives and Liberals just don't like all the "social programs" and especially the important ones (healthcare)

Perhaps, the NDP just doesn't like Canada's "social programs" either - or they would indeed see the necessity of overturning this tax ruling!

Perhaps, all the people that cry out in agreement that Income Trusts needed to be killed, just don't like all the "social programs either? These people, perhaps, never saved a dime for the future and, out of jealousy, happily see the angst of those savers/investors that have been robbed by the law. The chain of angst will continue though, onto those who have been depending upon healthcare, welfare, CPP, EI etc.

It would seem that politicians and their entourages, and many average voters are hypocritical, stupid, envious and greedy. Some nation!

Saving a Middle Class - no one is doing it.
Saving Democracy - no one is doing it.
Saving Canada - no one is doing it.
Saving a democratic peoples' right to self-autonomy - no one is doing it.