Well, the Globe has been caught in their lie about what Euromoney said and what Euomoney didn’t say about Flaherty’s conduct of the past, and this time are actually doing something about. See below. Apparently the first thing that the Globe “infers” from Flaherty’s “unpopular” income trust tax is that it is “courageous”. That would be at the very bottom of my list. What about “reckless”, “deceitful”, "dishonourable", self destructive” etc etc.?
Meanwhile what gives the Globe the right to infer anything about what Euromoney said and then attribute it to Euromoney as if it was Euromoney's thought in the first place as opposed to the Globe's?
Sheesh, I don't think the Globe gets it, even now?
From: "Stead, Sylvia"
To: Brent Fullard
Conversation: Globe and Mail
Subject: Globe and Mail
In naming Jim Flaherty the winner of their prize, Euromoney says his decision was unpopular; from which courageous could be inferred. However, because they did not use that word, we will clarify or correct the record.
Thursday, October 8, 2009
Posted by Fillibluster at 4:53 PM