NDP fails the standards of new Supreme Court of Canada Ruling

Supreme Court Ruling: "Decisions about what constitutes an acceptable bargain can only authoritatively be made if both parties come to the negotiating table with the information needed to consider what concessions to accept or offer," Madam Justice Rosalie Abella wrote for the court.

Ways and Means Motion “bargain” on Income Trust tax: “Ensuring that taxes are not unfairly shifted onto the shoulders of Canadian taxpayers, especially Canadian families”

NDP’s standard for the information required to accept an offer: “I have spoken with Judy Wasylycia-Leis, our party’s Finance Critic, she is confident that the government’s estimates of future tax leakage are accurate.”

Jack Mintz on Government’s estimates of future tax leakage: “I do want to point out that there is a serious flaw in some analyses especially on the taxation of pension and RRSP accounts. Finance was not right to treat the impact as zero.”

Michael Ignatieff on Government’s estimates of future tax leakage: “Flaherty’s argument of tax leakage is fallacious”.

Flaherty’s “proof” of alleged tax leakage: 18 pages of blacked out documents....that he demanded be returned?

Is this country run by the legal standards espoused by the Supreme Court, or those of supremely incompetent and corrupt politicians like Judy Wasylycia-Leis and Jim Flaherty?