So today we learn from Dona Cadman that she is absolving Harper from any guilt or involvement in this alleged insurance policy bribe based on having “looked into Harper’s eyes.”
Dona Cadman’s statement of today claims: “I knew he was telling me the truth; I could see it in his eyes."
Interesting, since most woman look at Harper and see nothing more than a cold fish. Not Dona Cadman.
When exactly did this eye examination take place?
Isn’t Dona Cadman a little concerned that she’s repeating the same mistake that George Bush infamously made with Vladimir Putin?
Who the hell is Dona Cadman to absolve Stephen Harper? What are her unique powers of absolution? Oh yeah, Conservative candidate for Surrey North.
The truth is Dona Cadman’s statement of today means nothing, except that Harper is getting desperate. We still have Dona Cadman saying that her husband informed her that the Conservatives offered her husband a $1 million insurance policy bribe and we have Harper’s tape recorded acknowledgment that “The offer to Chuck was blah blah blah.....”
Why is Dona Cadman squandering her credibility on Harper? Who does she think she is? A soothsayer?
The best insurance policy is to always tell the truth and stick to subject matter you understand.
Looked into his eyes? Could see the truth? I think Dona is selling herself cheap.
What's next up Harper's sleeve? Palm reading? Tea leaves? Tarot cards?
Monday, March 3, 2008
Posted by Fillibluster at 3:54 PM