Monday, March 3, 2008

Why doesn't Harper sue CAITI?



We called his tax leakage analysis fraudulent in a full page ad in the Toronto Star?

Flaherty?

Could it be that we're right?



_

4 comments:

Robert Gibbs said...

Answer:

Of course CAITI is right!

The scumbag, loud-mouth troll hasn't got the cahonas to allow himself to be "exposed".

GET TOUGH ON HIS CRIME.
HANG 'EM, HANG 'EM HIGH.
PUT A NOOSE AROUND HIS NECK.

Dr Mike said...

Note to myself : if you ever see Jimmy , kick his ass & tell him it was just a muscle spasm .

That way he can`t sue me for wrongful ass-kicking!!

Mike.

Once a tory always a fool said...

Brent,
Good question. I've wondered about the very question you ask. Except for the fact that the many starement may be true, Harper and Flaherty have been slandered across this great land from shining sea to sewer outfall offshore Victoria BC. With all the cash-money that that the Harper Tory Party has, you might have thought that his Party would have defended its name and reputation.

Danny Williams stands head and shoulders above all accusers. Why no action?

Some pretty nasty things have been said on the many blogs -- things like "Fraud, liar, cheat." Why no action against the bloggers?

But Brent, are you inviting trouble? Are you lonely? Do you need to some more human contact? Try for some warm, kind and loving contact. Stay away from the hot, angry and abusive legal system.

But where was I? Oh ya... Why no action against the bloggers? Perhaps because the courtroom is place where people can put the truth before someone who is independent and objective, and perhaps because the truth according to the Harper Tory Party is a stinking pile of falsehoods. But let’s go to court and find out.

Mary the golfer said...

Mikee

You could just tell him that "Stevie told you to do it".

Mary P