Why doesn't Harper sue CAITI?

Monday, March 3, 2008

Why doesn't Harper sue CAITI?

We called his tax leakage analysis fraudulent in a full page ad in the Toronto Star?

Flaherty?

Could it be that we're right?

_

3 comments:

Anonymous said...: Answer:

Of course CAITI is right!

The scumbag, loud-mouth troll hasn't got the cahonas to allow himself to be "exposed".

GET TOUGH ON HIS CRIME.
HANG 'EM, HANG 'EM HIGH.
PUT A NOOSE AROUND HIS NECK.; March 3, 2008 at 12:46 PM
Anonymous said...: Brent,
Good question. I've wondered about the very question you ask. Except for the fact that the many starement may be true, Harper and Flaherty have been slandered across this great land from shining sea to sewer outfall offshore Victoria BC. With all the cash-money that that the Harper Tory Party has, you might have thought that his Party would have defended its name and reputation.

Danny Williams stands head and shoulders above all accusers. Why no action?

Some pretty nasty things have been said on the many blogs -- things like "Fraud, liar, cheat." Why no action against the bloggers?

But Brent, are you inviting trouble? Are you lonely? Do you need to some more human contact? Try for some warm, kind and loving contact. Stay away from the hot, angry and abusive legal system.

But where was I? Oh ya... Why no action against the bloggers? Perhaps because the courtroom is place where people can put the truth before someone who is independent and objective, and perhaps because the truth according to the Harper Tory Party is a stinking pile of falsehoods. But let’s go to court and find out.; March 3, 2008 at 12:58 PM
Anonymous said...: Mikee

You could just tell him that "Stevie told you to do it".

Mary P; March 3, 2008 at 12:58 PM

Post a Comment

VIDEOS

Part 1: Why did Jack Layton fall for Harper's tax leakage lie?

Part 2: Why did Jack Layton fall for Harper's tax leakage lie?

Part 3: Why did Jack Layton fall for Harper's tax leakage lie?

Part 4: Why did Jack Layton fall for Harper's tax leakage lie?

Sheriff Flaherty: "It's the law now."

Vancouver Quadra campaign: Cadman and income trust scandals

Finance Committee questions Mark Carney

John McCallum takes on Flaherty Question Period Dec 13, 2007

CAITI's Brent Fullard at the Halloween Vigil Ottawa Oct 31, 2007

Dick Schmeelk "Confessions of a Carpetbagger"

Seymour Schulich on BNN with Amanda Lang

Brent Fullard on BNN May 14, 2007

CAITI's new radio spot as a video!

Eric Reguly calls IT fallout a Disaster for Flaherty

John McCallum's Apr 19 Toronto Town Hall meeting on BNN's Squeezeplay

John McCallum's Apr 12 Calgary Town Hall Meeting on CBC

John McCallum's Apr 12 Calgary Town Hall Meeting on Global

Jason Kenney's Apr 10 Calgary Town Hall Meeting

The Liberal Plan

Garth Turner Income Trust Press Conference Jan 29

Stephen Harper - Promises Made 1

Stephen Harper - Promises Made 2

WE"D LIKE SOME ANSWERS

As you well know, the ‘income trust thing’ has grown beyond the question of whether fair taxes are paid on income from trusts. It’s become a giant dirty snowball, and as it rolls forward it accumulates more and more bulk. There are so many unanswered questions. Let's list a few and invite our "Accountable" government and our free press to provide some much-needed answers.

It is said “Trusts are inefficient use of capital. Why?” Two related questions are ‘Whose money is it, anyway?’, and ‘Do Canadian investors have a free and efficient market?’

How can information that is already in the public domain at SEDAR make for a state secret? How could such information be used to harm the Canadian national interest? And who would cause the harm?

Why won’t the Canadian media investigate the falsehoods and misrepresentations told by the Minister of Finance to a committee of Parliament? Was the Minister in contempt of Parliament?

Why won’t the Canadian media report (a) government tax revenues gained from BCE in 2006 when BCE was a corporation to (b) government tax revenues that would be gained in 2007 from BCE, if BCE had been allowed to proceed to a trust, and (c) government tax revenues that will be gained in 2007 from BCE, when BCE ownership has been carved up as 45% foreign ownership and 55% large Canadian pension fund ownership?

C A I T I - O N L I N E

Monday, March 3, 2008