Thursday, September 4, 2008

Harper offers two different versions of testimony in Cadman bribery scandal



Harper testifies he personally authorized Cadman offer


Sep 03, 2008 07:35 PM
Tim Naumetz
THE CANADIAN PRESS

OTTAWA – Prime Minister Stephen Harper has testified that he personally authorized an offer made to late MP Chuck Cadman in 2005 for help defeating the Liberal government.

In sworn testimony filed Wednesday in Ontario Superior Court, Harper said it happened after he heard Cadman was willing to side with the Tories but couldn't because of financial distress and fear of losing an election.

It was Harper's first detailed account of his role in the so-called Cadman affair and, during four hours of testimony, he offered two different versions of when he first learned about Cadman's financial troubles.

Harper said he approved the overture to Cadman on May 18, 2005, the day before a crucial confidence vote, after receiving a message from his top political organizer and campaign manager, Doug Finley.

Harper testified during a cross-examination in his $3.5-million libel suit against the Liberal party that he gave permission for Finley to speak to Cadman, a former Conservative, even though he was sure Cadman was going to support the Liberals in the confidence vote.

This is Harper's only lengthy explanation of his actions in the Cadman affair – allegations that Conservative representatives offered Cadman a $1-million insurance policy to help defeat the Liberals.

Harper testified that he personally met Cadman on April 1 that year in an attempt to coax him back to the Conservative fold, after having authorized a similar approach by former Tory MP John Reynolds as early as the previous fall.

Under cross-examination by the Liberal party lawyer, Harper initially said Finley informed him about Cadman's worries over finances and life insurance the following September.

Cadman had terminal cancer at the time of the 2005 confidence vote – which the Liberals survived thanks to Cadman's support – and died later that summer. Harper sued the Liberals over suggestions posted on their web site that he was aware of a bribery attempt in the affair.

A biography of Cadman written by B.C. author Tom Zytaruk quotes Cadman's widow, Dona, saying two Conservatives approached Cadman two days before the confidence vote with a package of incentives to vote against the Liberals and rejoin the Conservatives, including the insurance policy.

But Harper testified during the examination nearly two weeks ago in Ottawa that the only offer to Cadman he authorized was the one requested by Finley the day before the May 19 confidence vote.

He said he first learned of the insurance policy, as well as Cadman's financial straits, when Dona Cadman told him of the offer during a personal visit he made to her house on Sept. 9, 2005, where, after his talk with Dona Cadman, he was interviewed by Zytaruk.

"When I talked to Doug subsequent to my conversation with Dona and Tom Zytaruk, and I started to inquire, we started to bang heads together about where this story was coming from," Harper said during four hours of cross-examination that took place in the boardroom of the Gowlings law firm in Ottawa, where his lawyer, Richard Dearden, is a partner.

"Doug told me, you know, he didn't source it, but he told me that he had heard stories about Chuck being concerned about his finances and being concerned about insurance, but he said, in fact, Chuck had never raised any such matter with him," Harper said.

"My first reaction to the story was it sounded preposterous to me. I couldn't understand how or why anyone would offer a man with cancer a life insurance policy . . . and Doug Finley certainly wouldn't have done it because Doug is not a . . . personal benefits man."

But as Liberal lawyer Chris Paliare pressed Harper about whether he had been told by anyone earlier that Cadman was worried about financial security, the prime minister offered new details.

"Maybe I should add to you where this came up firstly," he said. "This is when Doug Finley called me through my executive, Ray Novak, on the 18th, and he asked permission to approach Chuck Cadman on behalf of the party to get him to rejoin the caucus, and that the story was that Chuck wanted to vote with us in Parliament as he usually did, and that he would want to rejoin the caucus and fight with us in an election campaign, but that he couldn't because he didn't have, you know, he didn't have the financing, he would have lost the election, et cetera, et cetera."

Harper testified that his initial response was that he believed Cadman was going to vote with the Liberals, based on his earlier April 1 discussion with Cadman.

The prime minister said party members were conveying the message ``aggressively" to him that then-prime minister Paul Martin and other Liberals had approached Cadman seeking support in the Commons vote and that he "had a responsibility to make sure that Chuck was formally approached and that it was clearly understood that he could rejoin the caucus, that he could get the nomination, there was no doubt about that, and that he would be a priority for the party in terms of re-election and financial support. And on that basis, I authorized the meeting on the 19th."

Though Harper has not taken any legal action against Zytaruk, he has contended since last June that a tape of the interview Zytaruk conducted with him outside Dona Cadman's home was doctored.

Zytaruk is heard asking Harper about the life insurance policy, Harper is heard saying he did not know the details but was aware party representatives had approached Cadman with an offer of ``financial considerations" in case of a snap election.

He has since said the financial considerations included campaign expenses and support, but added more detail about Finley's offer during the cross examination.

"(Finley) said he had no offer of a policy of insurance, he was there to lay down for Chuck that he could join the caucus, that he would automatically get the nomination, and the party would take care of squaring that away in the riding, that he would become, this is the detail that Doug gave me at the time, that he would become part of what we call the target seed voter program which has a number of various benefits for candidacy that is high priority for the party in terms of financial support, in terms of services and other kinds of campaign support."

Harper said at another point in the testimony: "The argument was that Chuck wanted to vote with us and wanted to be in our caucus; the reason he would not vote with us, the reason he would not rejoin the caucus, was because he didn't want to be stranded as an independent. The whole argument was that he would not be able to fight and election campaign, that he would be financing this campaign out of his pocket, that he would be extremely vulnerable."

Under further questioning, Harper said the assistance would have included a repayable loan to Cadman's riding association – "not to the candidate himself, not him personally."

The Liberals' lawyer pressed Harper about whether the insurance policy Dona Cadman described may actually have been a top-up to Cadman's life insurance as an MP should he lose his seat in an electon. Harper said he was unaware of those kinds of details.

Paliare also probed Harper over the difference between offers of financial assistance or aid to reimburse candidate expenses and offers made "for securing a vote to bring down a government."

Harper rejected the comparison, saying his party "cannot agree under any circumstances to provide a personal benefit" to a candidate before or after an election. He said the party can only agree to transfer money – in accordance with electoral law – to its own candidate.

Paliare also questioned Harper over the prime minister's claim the Zytaruk tape had been doctored and Harper said several times during the examination that he believed Zytaruk himself altered the tape.

A Superior Court hearing is scheduled for Sept. 22, likely in the midst of a federal election campaign, where expert evidence on the authenticity and integrity of the tape will be heard.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

YOu must be using the Toronto Star as your source.

Of course the Liberal Star deletes the second paragraph which is the most important part of the story.

Here is the "meat" that the Star felt they needed to delete.

"But he maintained he knew nothing about an alleged offer of a $1 million life insurance policy to get Cadman's vote, saying he only approved an offer of campaign financial support in the event of an election."

Above was the actual second paragraph of the Canadian Press story.

Why did the Toronto Star delete it?

Ctv, National Post and the Globe left it alone.

Why did the Liberal Party of Canada's propaganda machine delete it?

CAITI said...

Hey Anonymous:

Not to worry, as we know Harper to be a blatant outright liar..when he attempted to justify his income trust betrayal with his fabricated and manufactured argument called tax leakage.

Polyian said...

Little wonder why Harper want's an election sooner than later. Before all his wrong doing is exposed. "Two different versions" happens with perpetual Liars...Harper can't keep the Lies sorted out to provided a consistent story.

Dr Mike said...

Anonymous

First you are assuming Harper is telling the truth----Ha ha ha ha.

Second , say Harper is telling the truth (gasp) there could still have been an offer made by his lieutenants.

Testimony is a funny thing , it has the ability to be shaped to what is required.

Good luck to us ever knowing what really happened..

Dr Mike.

Anonymous said...

Rick Mercers rant is good on this subject:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gkFMwFlfB6I