Blind side-by-side morality tests reveal that Jack Layton can be so easily fooled, in a way that Elizabeth May can not.
Would Jack Layton accept blacked out documents as proof of his bank balance, or simple in cases where 2.5 million Canadians’ lose $35 billion? Elizabeth did not and called for public inquiry into Harper’s false claims of tax leakage, making Elizabeth May a saint and Jack Layton a criminal, as he participated in a fraud.
Was Jack Layton just being dumb and lazy or was he accepting of Harper’s lies about tax leakage in exchange for the income trust tax carve-out that was extended to the public sector pension funds like OMERs who could own trusts privately (like Teranet) and not pay the tax, yet average Canadians seeking to share in the profits of Ontario’s monopoly land registration system in their RRSPs can not?
What kind of Tax Fairness Plan is that? How does that "level the playing field"?
Which is it Jack Layton? Fraudster or dummy?
Fraud: an intentional deception made for personal gain or to damage another individual.
See YouTube: Why did Jack Layton fall for Harper's tax leakage lie?
Tuesday, January 19, 2010
Would Jack Layton accept blacked out documents for his bank statement?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
Maybe the blacked out documents won't show anything to support your argument, but Flaherty keeps them blacked out just to drive you crazy?
Seen Jack Layton in action ... From what I witnessed, No he is not allowed to think for himself. He seems to like it that way. It keeps him employed and same with his goons.
Starting to wonder what brokerage firm handles the NDP finances ... hmm maybe there lies our answer why him and Mulcair are incapable of discussing the trust unit issue intelligently.
Their constituents or the people they claim they want to represent are regular targets of crappy brokerage firms like Investors Group, Manulie, idiot bank financial people with no actual background in finance who are legally allowed to shove bank mutual funds and other crappy bank products down their customer's throats and if questioned they act like real products are too high risk, Primerica, etc.
Maybe the N.D.P. receive funding from these sources?
Jack isn`t any dummy as he showed when he refused to support the HST.
This non-support at least shows us that he is not a corporate hack like most other politicians.
The pension carve-out was his payment.
Dr Mike
Maybe the blacked out documents won't show anything to support your argument, but Flaherty keeps them blacked out just to drive you crazy?
Nice try. I have known since November 1, 2006 what these documents are hiding, which is that Flaherty along with Carney deliberatlly excluded the deferred taxes paid on income trusts dictributions received in RRSPs.
To do so defies the rules of "Accrual Accounting" laid down bythe Audiotor General.
TO include these taxes, would be to have NO TAX LEAKAGE.
See:
You Tube on Why would Jack Layton accept blacked out documents as proof of tax leakage???
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NF6RMR7SGBc&feature=related
Post a Comment